La RAM est bon marché, alors pourquoi ne pas tout gérer?

Table des matières:

La RAM est bon marché, alors pourquoi ne pas tout gérer?
La RAM est bon marché, alors pourquoi ne pas tout gérer?

Vidéo: La RAM est bon marché, alors pourquoi ne pas tout gérer?

Vidéo: La RAM est bon marché, alors pourquoi ne pas tout gérer?
Vidéo: 5 RAISONS de POURQUOI Votre PC Est LENT - YouTube 2024, Avril
Anonim
Les modules de RAM sont moins chers que jamais, alors pourquoi ne pas utiliser notre système d'exploitation dans son intégralité à partir de banques de RAM très rapides?
Les modules de RAM sont moins chers que jamais, alors pourquoi ne pas utiliser notre système d'exploitation dans son intégralité à partir de banques de RAM très rapides?

La séance de questions-réponses d'aujourd'hui nous est offerte par la sous-division SuperUser de Stack Exchange, un groupe de sites Web de questions-réponses dirigé par la communauté.

La question

Le lecteur superutilisateur pkr298 veut savoir pourquoi nous n'exécutons pas de machines basées sur la RAM, mais sur des disques. Il écrit:

RAM is cheap, and much faster than SSDs. It’s just volatile. So why don’t computers have a LOT of RAM, and on power up, load everything to the RAM from the hard drive/SSD and just run everything from there, assuming there’s no real need to persist anything outside of memory? Wouldn’t computers be much faster?

Of course, current operating system may not support this at all, but is there any reason RAM isn’t used this way?

En apparence, son enquête a du sens, mais il est clair que nous ne sommes pas submergés par les versions informatiques basées sur la RAM; Quelle est l'histoire en arrière?

La réponse

Hennes, contributeur à SuperUser, explique pourquoi nous utilisons encore des systèmes basés sur disque:

There are a few reasons RAM is not used that way:

  1. Common desktop (DDR3) RAM is cheap, but not quite that cheap. Especially if you want to buy relatively large DIMMs.
  2. RAM loses its contents when powered off. Thus you would need to reload the content at boot time. Say you use a SSD sized RAMDISK of 100GB, that means about two minutes delay while 100GB are copied from the disk.
  3. RAM uses more power (say 2–3 Watt per DIMM, about the same as an idle SSD).
  4. To use so much RAM, your motherboard will need a lot of DIMM sockets and the traces to them. Usually this is limited to six or less. (More board space means more costs, thus higher prices.)
  5. Lastly, you will also need RAM to run your programs in, so you will need the normal RAM size to work in (e.g. 18GiB, and enough to store the data you expect to use).

Having said that: Yes, RAM disks do exist. Even as PCI board with DIMM sockets and as appliances for very high IOps. (Mostly used in corporate databases before SSD’s became an option). These things are not cheap though. Here are two examples of low end RAM disk cards which made it into production:

Note that there are way more ways of doing this than just by creating a RAM disk in the common work memory.
Note that there are way more ways of doing this than just by creating a RAM disk in the common work memory.

You can:

  1. Use a dedicated physical drive for it with volatile (dynamic) memory. Either as an appliance, or with a SAS, SATA or PCI[e] interface.
  2. You can do the same with battery backed storage (no need to copy initial data into it since it will keep its contents as long as the backup power stays valid).
  3. You can use static RAMs rather then DRAMS (simpler, more expensive).
  4. You can use flash or other permanent storage to keep all the data (Warning: flash usually has a limited number of write cycles). If you use flash as only storage then you just moved to SSDs. If you store everything in dynamic RAM and save to flash backup on power down then you went back to appliances.

I am sure there is way more to describe, from Amiga RAD: reset surviving RAM disks to IOPS, wear leveling and G-d knows what, However I will cut this short and only list one more item:

DDR3 (current DRAM) prices versus SSD prices:

  • DDR3: € 10 per GiB, or € 10,000 per TiB
  • SSDs: Significantly less. (About 1/4th to 1/10th.)

Si vous voulez en savoir plus sur les disques RAM, consultez le document intitulé Disques RAM expliqués: Ce qu’ils sont et pourquoi vous ne devriez probablement pas en utiliser un.

Avez-vous quelque chose à ajouter à l'explication? Sound off dans les commentaires. Voulez-vous lire plus de réponses d'autres utilisateurs de Stack Exchange doués en technologie? Découvrez le fil de discussion complet ici.

Conseillé: